Prediction of Sean Cuenin [783rd] vs Marlon Vankan [731st] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
L W W W W L W W W LH2H: Cuenin 1 - 0 Vankan
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cuenin winning 2 and Vankan winning 1. The last match between Cuenin and Vankan was at the M25 Antalya, 10-04-2025, Second, Clay with Sean Cuenin getting the victory 6-7(7) 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sean Cuenin | 1 |
| Marlon Vankan | 0 |
| Cuenin | Stats | Vankan |
|---|---|---|
| 77% (24-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 61% (17-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 783 | Ranking | 731 |
| 503 | Highest Rank | 514 |
| 21 | Age | 24 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 2 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (95-64) | Career Total W/L | 54% (160-139) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Sean Cuenin
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 14 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:48:29 | Average Match Time | 2:48:29 |
| 62% (61/99) | 1st Serve % | 71% (72/102) |
| 62% (38/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (41/72) |
| 50% (19/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 58% (7/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 71% (5/7) |
| 49% (50/102) | Return Points Win % | 42% (42/99) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sean Cuenin vs Marlon Vankan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Cuenin 1 - 0 Vankan
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cuenin has won 40.71% of points on their second serve, while Vankan has won 43.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cuenin, in recent form, has won 45.85% of their opponent's second serve points, while Vankan has won 47.32%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.58% and 31.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cuenin has saved 48.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Vankan has saved 53.06% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cuenin has won 76.92% of matches played (W/L 40/ 12), with Vankan winning 55.22% (W/L 37/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cuenin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 42/ 22), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 44/ 36). Vankan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 147/ 115), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Cuenin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.92% of matches (W/L 40/ 12), where as Vankan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 35/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cuenin winning 1 times and Vankan being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Cuenin winning 2 and Vankan winning 1. The last match between Cuenin and Vankan was at the M25 Antalya, 10-04-2025, Second, Clay with Sean Cuenin getting the victory 6-7(7) 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:48:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Cuenin and Vankan have played a deciding set 1 times, with Cuenin winning 1 times and Vankan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Cuenin winning 0, and Vankan 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cuenin has played against opponents with an average rank of 112.79 while Vankan has played against players with an average rank of 133.75.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cuenin has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Vankan has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cuenin has converted 36.76% of breakpoint opportunities, and Vankan has converted 36.17% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Sean Cuenin vs Marlon Vankan Best Odds For The Match
Sean Cuenin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Sean Cuenin
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Markus Molder
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Christian Djonov
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
2
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
5-7 7-5 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sergey Fomin
Player
Sean Cuenin
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Sarp Agabigun
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
49 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Stefan Palosi
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
87)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
0
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
42%
(
39 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
94
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Marlon Vankan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-2 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Sean Cuenin
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
61 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
72 of
102)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Cezar Cretu
67%
(
63 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
66 of
88)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
3
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
40 of
66)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Maksim Shin
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
34 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 4-6 12-10 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Stijn Slump
Player
Marlon Vankan
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
67%
(
18 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Cuenin vs Vankan?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Cuenin Vs Vankan is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (95/64) | Win/Loss | 54% (160/139) |
| 59% (209/148) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (357/317) |
| 54% (1788/1505) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3190/3070) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 341 | Aces Total | 278 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 367 | Total Double Faults | 523 |
| 1:26:57 | Average Match Time | 1:12:39 |
| 228.38 | Average Opponent Rank | 149.19 |
| 63% (5404/8610) | 1st Serve % | 67% (9428/14170) |
| 67% (3606/5404) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (5851/9428) |
| 49% (1559/3206) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (2280/4742) |
| 44% (417/944) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (650/1482) |
| 42% (3629/8637) | Return Points Win % | 41% (5796/14075) |
| 61% (95/157) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (158/295) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (15/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (29/54) |
| 54% (21/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (40/78) |
| 85% (96/82) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (155/137) |
| 15% (96/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (155/18) |
| 21% (63/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (144/22) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
